Laura Michelle Owens - Court Case History

All editors are welcome to contribute any relevant information to Laura Owens' legal cases against Clayton Echard, Dave Neal, or others. Anyone is free to sign up and start editing, but all users must abide by the Wiki Code of Conduct. Please make sure to read the linked code of conduct before editing.

---

This wiki page is dedicated to shedding lights on Laura M Owens' litigious nature.

To date, Laura has entered the court system multiple times and has used the police system against 3+ men she has had sexual encounters with. Each victim has had a unique relationship/encounter with Laura, ranging from an actual relationship to a one-night stand. After these men respectively ended their time with Laura and acknowledge that they didn't want to pursue her further, she either claimed that they abused her, that she was pregnant with their child(ren), or both. Following those claims, she enters the legal system to "prove" her claims.

Currently, she is in a legal battle with Clayton Echard, whom she engaged in oral sex one evening with. When he didn't want to pursue a relationship with her, Laura claimed she was pregnant with twins from the oral sex encounter. You can find more in-depth information on the timeline and see the public court documents here.

People sued or threatened by Owens

Victim #1

Victim #1 wishes to remain anonymous, but journalists have been in touch and corroborated their story.

Michael Marraccini

Main article: Michael Marraccini

Per court documents, Marraccini and Owens' began a relationship in early 2016, which Marraccini tried to end later that year. Over the next two years, among others, she threatened suicide, feigned a pregnancy with his child, stalked him, claimed he raped her, and filed a domestic violence suit against him. In 2022, Owens allegedly described him in a TedX talk about how a note from a stranger convinced her to leave her verbally abusive boyfriend.

Victim #3

Victim #3 wishes to remain anonymous, but journalists have been in touch and corroborated their story.

Unsubstantiated Allegations, Claims, and Theories

There is a belief that Laura Owens impersonated a Howard University journalism student, by the name of Chase Jay Jones, in an attempt to get Echard canceled for having participated in a TikTok dance challenge featuring a song with the "n-word" in it. After this theory began to circulate, Jones' identity was scrubbed from the internet. The IP address that Chase Jay Jones used was traced back to the region Owens lives in. Source: All Ears Podcast episode with Dave Neal

In a later update on Jones, Dave Neal states, "Chase Jay Jones 100% joined my Patreon October 19th. I have this proof that they were lurking in there for several weeks. We tried to get their billing info from Patreon, who proved to be UTTERLY USELESS. Even with a court ordered subpoena, they weren’t able to find CJJ in their database. This person has vanished from the world. They either had their data scrubbed, or they’re hiding under a different username. All efforts are being taken to find their identity. More on that later."

Greg Gillespie

Greg Gillespie believes that Laura Owens was not actually pregnant with his twins, nor was she ever, despite her claims.

Laura Owens alleges that Gillespie hacked into her iMessage in 2021, sending himself the original faked sonogram. In 2023, Laura Owens alleges that Gillespie hacked her email account - she further alleges that Gillespie had hacked into her email account and distributed the fake sonogram video depicting her alleged twins with Clayton Echard to the press.

Clayton Echard

Clayton Echard, like Greg Gillespie, believes that Laura Owens was never pregnant with his twins, despite her claims.

Echard is still paying for legal representation; he is actively several thousand dollars in debt over this. If you’d like to donate, you can do so here.

Court Documents

Most recent court filings:

2/16/24 - DENIED / RE PETITIONERS MOTION TO QUASH DEPOSITION OF PETITIONER (not yet acquired)

2/12/24 - EXPEDITED MOTION TO SET VIRTUAL STATUS CONFERENCE/(EXPEDITED RULING REQUESTED) (not yet acquired)

2/6/24 - EXPEDITED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TRIAL TIME (EXPEDITED RULING REQUESTED)

2/2/44 - Reply to Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion for Confidentiality and Preliminary Protective Order

Additional Sources and Coverage

All public coverage from Dave Neal’s Youtube can be found here: Playlist

Megan Fox Coverage can be found here: YouTube Playlist

Hearings uploaded to Youtube here: SchnitzelNinja — YouTube

Clayton spoke about his case on The Viall Files podcast on Jan 11, 2024.

Clayton also spoke about his case on The Unplanned Podcast on Feb 7, 2024.

Disclaimers

This timeline is now being hosted here on JusticeForClayton.com after the original timeline, posted to Reddit, was taken down along with the subsequent repost of the content on Medium (archive.org link). This page cites public court records and, except for the clearly delimited speculation at the bottom, only includes verifiable facts. We will happily update this page to include any substantive evidence proving a pregnancy and Clayton Echard's paternity, but a screenshot of a doctor's appointment doesn't meet any reasonable standard. The operator of this site claims no authorship over the content below and is simply rehosting it for public accountability.

As of 2/18/2024, this site's web host has received two cease and desist notices from Owens, claiming that this site is operated by one or more of Marraccini, Gillespie, or Echard and that wild legal theories compel the host to abide by her orders of protection against them. Legal fantasy notwithstanding, this site is not operated by any of those individuals. As an anonymous wiki, the operators cannot be sure that those individuals are not among our users, but as long as contributions are justified by valid citations, we welcome anyone's contribution. This wiki aims to be a collected summary of citations of independently verifiable sources. We will revise its content in response to credible evidence as more is made available. The intent of this wiki is not to harass or defame anyone, but rather to preserve important public information that has been repeatedly removed from other sites under abusive takedown notices.

contact